Understanding Public Relations Business Power
The case of Iran
Mehdi Bagherian
Member of Iran Public Relations Professionals Association Board of Directors
Kargozar Public Relations Institute Manager
Iran International PR Conferences Secretary General
2006
info@iranpr.org
Abstract
This paper
deals with the principles for understanding public relations business
power in Iran and will show that investment on public relations will
have a very positive outcome.
This
paper tries to reveals the PR value to us on one hand and on the other
hand it puts this fact on the sharp focus that today good performance is
not the all thing but its presentation bears the same value and
importance.
This
paper also deals with another value called “communication”. It confesses
that today world is suffering the problem of “communication deep gap”.
Paying attention to communication management and planning for its
improvement in future is a most. As Betek Van Roler, Amsterdam
University Professor, says “management future will grow in the gap
between demand and supply for in case when there is no growth, there
will be no future for the management itself.
Another issue pointed in this paper is communication programs nature
based on the culture and local values. The programs having one sided
nature fail. This is why the countries can not expand the effective ties
without understanding bilateral communication programs, getting
information, atmosphere control and bilateral understanding. The
communications methods used today are inactive and their activation
needs investment on some areas especially public relations.
Revealing the importance and status of Iran business geography, this
paper will show finally that public relations and the attempts made by
the new public relations generation can play an important role in
changing Iran into one of the world developed and major countries.
Introduction
As we all
know, public relations is not a newborn of the new age, and this very
important tool has been used differently concurrent with economic,
technical, rational and scientific development in the past. Because
human beings had communicative needs in every stage of their life, and
had followed up these needs through different channels and tools. There
are different books, introducing different ways through which ancient
human beings used to satisfy their communicative needs.
Means of
communication in early stages were mostly face to face and personal. Of
course their tools, methods, abilities, extent of effectiveness were
very different from what we practice now.
The remained
literature and inscription from different ages, stony bulletins,
Hakhamanesh system’s actions and Greek philosophers, Senate members of
Rom, speeches of roman kings and heads, all shows the importance of
public opinion.
For example,
there is archeological evidence that India's Emperor Asoka used rock and
pillar edicts for such things as communicating the policies of his
government to his subjects, persuading them to observe those policies,
creating harmony among them, and propagating Buddhism, to which he had
converted later in life. In the Arabian peninsula, a circular
handwritten on crude paper around 2000 B.C. is known to have advised
farmers of Babylonia on ways of increasing their crop yields. (See PR
encyclopedia, 2005) a great part of speeches in Nahjolbalaghe, a book
written by one of Muslims’ great leaders, Ali (may God’s blessing be
upon him), "shows this great leader’s enlightening treatment of people
and persuading them to think and judge properly about problems and
supporting the righteous government." (history of PR, Mehdi Aghapour,
2004)
But the new
meaning of public relations is a product of new age and is a source of
crisis and social and political campaigns and also the survival of huge
productive and business organizations from an economical perspective. On
the one hand, people could not tolerate the unfair system of these
organizations and on the other hand, economic entities, while
understanding the importance of public opinion and their supports, took
some actions which result in creation of public relations. These debates
and involvements along with practical actions of organizations and
nongovernmental motions succeed in the next years.
The same
process has occurred in different regions and countries in different
ways, and in some developing countries like Iran, due to lack of methods
domination and one dimensionality of power structure, legal and
professional debates and campaign have not been started yet or if they
have been started in some areas limitedly, they have not been gone to a
serious stage.
Existing
evidences and studies show that the emergence of public relations in
Iran is based upon commercial and economic changes, but its expansion
necessitates action-oriented and reinforcing the potentials of political
public relations, especially action and people-oriented motions.
The contrary
exists too. Many governmental organizations use public relations as a
political tools and for gaining false reputation and credit, and such
actions diminish the reputation of public relations to a ceremonial or
publicity profession and art. According to the researches don about
dependence of public relations, the role of PR offices in Iran is to
praise the managers of governmental and private organizations and PR
practitioners are not able to play a role within a professional, ethical
and occupational framework.
Asia,
Public Relation in
Asia is the
largest continent both in geographical size and in population. It is
arguably the most complex region as well. Particularly in the past
decade, Asian countries such as China and India have emerged as large
and significant markers for multinational corporations. This process of
cross-national trade in Asia continues to expand as evident during the
ninth ASEAN summit that concluded in Bali, Indonesia, on October 8,
2003. At this summit, the 10-nation ASEAN (Association of South-East
Asian Nations) signed mutual trade and security agreements with China,
Japan, South Korea, and India. The goal is to create a huge Asian
trading zone that will involve more than 60 percent of the world
population. The creation of these new markets will continue to demand an
increase in the level of public relations activity in the continent. (Sariramesh,
PR encyclopedia, 2005).
In addition to
this, Globalization has opened up the economies of a dozen or so Asian
countries, resulting in a significant influx of multinational
corporations into the region. A concomitant result has been the entry of
leading multinational public relations agencies into Asia, resulting in
an infusion of Western perspectives of public relations practice. Some
observers have rightly commented that this development has led to an
increase in the level of professionalism among public relations
practitioners in the continent. However, it is also important to
recognize that there has been no corresponding flow of information out
of Asia that could help in the development of effective strategies for
conducting public relations globally. It is reasonable to believe that a
continent as rich as Asia, with its long heritage, has something useful
to offer the public relations industry and pedagogy.
Most of the
multinational agencies operating in Asia have limited their operations
to about 12 countries primarily based on demand and economy. As other
Asian countries develop, there is bound to be significant growth in
cross-national public relations activities in those regions as well.
Multinational public relations agencies have typically used three
strategies to establish their presence in Asia. Some have opened their
own offices in Asian cities often under an executive from the home
office while employing host country employees at lower levels. A second
strategy has been to establish "exclusive representation" affiliations
with well-established domestic agencies of the host country. Finally,
these agencies also have bought partial or total equity in successful
domestic agencies, while retaining a part of the original name and much
of the local staff in recognition that retention of local staff is
instrumental to success given the complexity of the Asian environment,
which will be discussed presently. (Sariramesh, PR encyclopedia, 2005).
Values
and cultural elements in Asia
Two
important issues in the field of public relations should be considered
in the vast continent of Asia:
1.
The viewpoint of media to public
relations is negative in most Asian countries and this problem has been
severed in some periods. But nowadays, due to more presence of trained
PR practitioners in different fields especially media and creating close
communication, this viewpoint has been balanced to some extent.
Of course this
issue has another dimension and as it has been referred to in the PR
cyclopedia too, public relations has a humiliating concept in Asia.
Although due to proving its capabilities in recent years, this problem
has been moderated in media and public opinion. For example, in 1978,
the year of victory of revolution in Iran, the field of public relations
was suspended, while it was considered an American field. Or some
academics of communications do not consider public relations a system or
knowledge. Of course this scientific claim as it is called, has never
been unanswered.
2. Paying attention
to different cultural elements and defining new and sensitive cultural
methods as a principle is completely necessary and without considering
these elements, the activities of PR companies in this area will
definitely result in failure.
Terence
Fane-Saunders believes that
effective public relations in Asia just like other areas, is not
stereotype communications or trading communications. It is about
creating and managing relationships between the organisation and each of
its key publics. Of course, effective communications, verbal and
non-verbal, are vital. But so too are PR strategies that understand the
implications of corporate behaviour ; which recognise that it is
corporate and personal actions which will have the greatest and most
lasting impact on those relationships.
Communication also
need to be framed within the context of an informed understanding of the
cultural, religious, social and ethnic context of each community and
public. The fact that a message may be coherent, well expressed and
convincing, and that it has worked well in Asian market A, does not for
one minute guarantee that it will work equally well in Asian market B. (Terence
Fane-Saunders, international
dimensions of public relations in Asia)
One of the dangers of
international PR firms and PR networks is that they are often more
multi-local, than multinational. In other words they will have
capabilities in each market, but the executive working with the client
may never have worked outside his home country. So, he or she may have
little sense of the cultural variables from market to market. As a
result, a request will go out to colleagues in each target market to
handle the local aspect of an international assignment. But the
"localizing" will often be no more than translation , when what was
actually needed was a strategy planned from the outset to reflect
varying markets and cultures. (Terence
Fane-Saunders, international
dimensions of public relations in Asia)
Prof. Games E.
Grunig and his colleagues studied some surveys aimed at expanding a
major principle to the global one: We developed a theory of generic
principles and specific applications that falls midway between an
ethnocentric theory (that public relations is the same everywhere) and a
polycentric theory (that public relations is different everywhere). The
theory holds that in a broad, abstract way, the Excellence principles
can be applied in different cultures, economic systems, political
systems, media systems, levels of development, and degrees of activist
activity.
At the same
time, evidence continues to mount supporting the usefulness of our
theory of generic principles and specific applications. In addition to
the research cited in L. Grunig, J. Grunig, and Dozier (2002), Rhee
(2002) found support for the strategic management and symmetrical
principles in the work of a sample of Korean practitioners. Hung (2002)
and Chen (2005) found evidence for several of the principles in the work
of multinational companies in China. Van Dyke (2005) found that NATO
applied the principles in the public affairs work of its mission to
Bosnia. Finally, Yun (2005) found similar priciples in the literature of
public diplomacy and extracted the same Excellence factor from research
on the public diplomacy efforts of 113 of the 169 embassies in
Washington, D.C. that we extracted in the Excellence study and in our
research in Slovenia.(James E. Grunig, 2006).
Prof. James E.
Grunig continued to say that “Our research now is moving beyond
confirmation of the utility of the generic principles of the Excellence
theory.” Ni (2005) is studying how the relationship-building role of
public relations contributes to the global strategies of multinational
corporations. She has studied the management literature on global
strategy to extend our understanding of the strategic role of public
relations from national to global settings. Her research, in particular,
will help us learn how different global strategies require different
kinds of relationships with local employees. .(James E. Grunig, 2006).
The history
of public relations in Iran
The word and
modern version of public relations was experienced in Iran in 1954. Dr
Hamid Notghi, the father of Iran public relations, introduced public
relations to Iran by establishing a PR office in NIOC (National Iran Oil
Company).
Although the
activities of public relations were initially limited to the publicity,
advertising and ceremonies, but nowadays the range of its activities
have surrounded governmental and private organizations so that they use
public relations for increasing their reputation and credit.
About the
source and purpose of establishing public relations in Iran, just like
many other countries, different reasons and viewpoint have been
proposed. According to the studies of Dr. Mohammad Javad Nateghpour,
assistant professor of sociology in Tehran University, Mirza Hossein
Khan Sepahsalar, the intellectual chancellor of Naseredin Shah, replaced
the word of peasant with public and in that way; the word of public
relations was born in Iran. This story shows the political and social
state of public relations in Iran. Social because using public instead
of peasant is a clear manifestation of accepting the social rights of
them in the society, especially considering the social security and
welfare which were Sepahsalar’s main goals. This was exactly the
philosophy and final target of west civilization since people were no
more servants of king but the contrary was true. In other words, it was
the end of Naseri’s autocratic system and the beginnings of new
relations between public and government. (Nateghpour, 2005, page 109).
This theory
which is known mostly as the political PR theory indicates that
presenting ideas and establishing the structure of public relations
which could be a liaison between public and government, needs enough
knowledge, the technique of changing behavior and speech, (especially
the government officials who are called servants and didn’t know or
wanted anything except serving the king) and the art of communicating
with people (although they were no more called peasant but public, they
couldn’t believe it themselves and the king and his servants didn’t
accept either). It was in this period of time that public relations was
proposed in Mirza Hossein Khan’s bureau-at that time he was the minister
and later became the chancellor- and was put in practice. This plan of
Mirza Hossein Khan, like his other new and progressive plans such as
tribunal doctor, today is called coroner, has been forgotten very soon,
and the guilds whose profits were in danger, stopped the growth and
development of it under different pretexts. But it became the beginnings
of a way which was later paid attention to as the principle of new
society and new government.
Therefore,
while public relations was used in west by the emergence of new society
and as a need and necessity of changing and growth of capitalism, this
knowledge, technique and art has been put to use in Iran by the
emergence of intellectual officials and as a tool for creating change in
government and its structure in Iranian society. In other words, from
the beginning, public relations, not in its modern term but in a simple
form, was accompanied by growth, change and improvement.
By deposition
of Sepahsalar from government management and then his mysterious death,
the plans of new government were forgotten very quickly. Even the
mashroute motion couldn’t make a big change in the structure of
government. Although Reza Khan’s governance resulted in some
developments in industry and governmental bureaucracy, he didn’t see his
government in need of public relations. In that situation, public
relations in the large scale of government was limited to the ceremonies
and court. The lack of an ordered organization and dependable plans in
production and business, have made the government needless of public
relations. On the other hand, the progressive method of government,
especially about the relation between public and government, made public
relations meaningless.
Business
reforms in Iran during the second half of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi’s reign,
pave the ground for emergence and efficiency of public relations. The
competence in business, especially selling the products, purchased from
western manufacturers, accepting commercial representative for selling
western products and also reformation in the body of government and the
development of bureaucracy in Iran, paved the ground for a pondered on
and technical public relations. Clarifying the function of government,
the opportunistic competition of foreign businessmen and their internal
representative and expansion of a seeming free economic competition,
showed the lack of public relations more than before. In that period of
time, public relations had become the expressive language of government
and economic entities and its responsibility was to clarify and also
exaggerate the function of these organizations. Therefore, public
relations became a publicity agent for governmental and private
organizations. The expansion of scope of services in country against
agriculture and industry was the first step of service rendering public
relations. Even industries used public relations for introducing the
products to people and exploiting them. (Nateghpour, 2005, page 110)
Dr. Mahdi
Mohsenian Rad, the author of " Iran in four communication systems",
believes that public relations has been established in 1951 in Iran- the
same year in which Parsons put forward his theory in Harvard university.
He expressed the view that the establishment of public relations in Iran
was a vain attempt for creating a phenomenon in a closed system, while
it needed an open system. Part of public relations words is an incorrect
heritage that has been formed in years. Even the steps of this public
relations leaded to a close system.
“Iran and
England Oil Com. was in search of cheap labor. This document belongs to
that period of time, when it imported all its necessities except workers
from abroad especially India. It imported its bricks from Iraq. The
simplest issue of company was a hidden agenda and everyone, employees or
not, was not only unaware but in complete ignorance. Even the Iranian
stockholder agent was a foreigner. Therefore even the defender of Iran’
rights in the company was a foreigner. In such conditions, public
relations becomes an advertising agent. The purpose of public relations
is creating satisfaction inside and outside of organization and in
public. Creating awareness is not at all its responsibility. The goal is
not to train or increase awareness. Public relations should create
satisfaction. And creating satisfaction needs a lot of work. When you
are working in a closed system, you are not able to indicate
dissatisfaction. Public relations can be healthy when the atmosphere of
its activities- organizational or national- is open and be an open
subset itself.” said a researcher of Iran and England Oil Com.
(Quarterly of Kargozar PR, 2005, page 53)
Dr. Hosseinali
Afkhami, academic member of Allame Tabatabai University who has
researched about public relations training in Iran, considers the
establishment of first PR office in NIOC, the base of practicing this
field in Iran. Due to the establishment of first PR office in NIOC, the
first PR training course, held as a training seminar in 1954 in Abadan
and later in Kermanshah, could be registered by the name of this
company. But the official academic PR training for undergraduate program
started by the establishment of "Press and PR Higher Institute" (the
former name of social communication sciences faculty) in 1967 in Tehran
which enjoyed the scientific and managerial support of Keyhan Press
Institute and financial support of NIOC.
After the
universities were closed down in 1980, the PR undergraduate program,
after 13 years and training 1117 graduates, ended in Iran. In 1985, a
branch of social communications in the framework of social sciences,
which contained only 3 unites of PR principles and the rest 35 unites
were common lessens with communications and journalism restarted. After
the establishment of social communication field, again in 1989, the PR
branch with 20 specialty unites of PR and 40 common unites, along with
journalism returned to the field of communications sciences. Till 2004
the same process continued.
Since 1989 the
official PR training for bachelor’s degree, in addition to Allame
Tabatabaii University, started in Azad Islamic University of Tehran and
then four other cities. Also in recent years, Comprehensive scientific
and applied university in Tehran and nine other cities started courses
for associate of Arts and Bachelor of Arts degrees. These three centers,
while following the same training program in applying the academic
board, educational resources and relation with industry, have some
differences with each other. Among the other developments in recent
years, are establishing communications sciences in other universities
such as culture and communications course in Emam Sadegh University,
communications (journalism) in Tehran University, journalism in News
faculty affiliate to Islamic Republic News Agency, graduates program of
communications sciences in Allame Tabatabii, Tehran, Azad Islamic
Universities and IRIB Faculty which reinforce the scientific and
researching body of this field. In addition to the mentioned centers,
Media Studies and Research Center has been offering a course for
journalists and employees of PR offices for more than ten years.
Ministry of culture and Islamic Guidance, Center of Governmental
Managemet, Jahad Varsity of Tehran University and other governmental and
privet organizations offer short time courses too. Annually 400 students
for undergraduates program and about 1000 students for associate of arts
and Poudemani are accepted in 15 higher educational centers for the
major of public relations. The number of students majoring PR in the
mentioned centers are about 5000 persons and the share of the most
experienced university in this field (Tabatabaii) are just 200 students.
(Afkhami, 2005, pages 137-138)
Apart from the
purpose and cause of establishing public relations in Iran, after 55
years of its existence in this country, public relations is not
comprehend properly in bureaucratic and governmental structures. Many
managers when talking of public relations actually refer to its literal
sense. They believe that the main responsibility of public relations is
to obey the command of the highest rank in the organization and deceive
public opinion. But the new generation thinks differently about public
relations. They consider it the art of communicating with people to
satisfy them and finally defend the remained justice which permit the
other humans enjoy their humane and citizenship rights.
On the other
hand, the emergence and development of information technology,
especially the Internet was welcomed by PR practitioners. It could be
referred to establishing specialty web logs (more than 20 cases),
organizational web logs (more than 200 cases), developing of websites
and the other existing facilities.
PR experts
believe that in the age of information, public relations should be the
first entity that access to the local, national and global
communications network: "in the base of developing information
technology in general terms and electronic government in particular, the
state of public relations should be considered specifically. In this
field, the opportunities, threats, weak and strong points of application
of information technology and communications should be recognized from
the aspect of public relations. This cognition results in using
information technology by public relations as a tool and ….and pave the
necessary technical, engineering and human resources ground toward the
goals of their organizations." (Ali Akbar Jalali, 2005, page 94)
Dr. Kazem
Etemadnejad , the father of new communications of Iran, has another
opinion. He believes that due to the developments of information
societies and the freedom of information, the responsibility of public
relations is doubled. Information goes toward to people and the right of
access to information has been ratified in most countries. The draft of
this plan has been prepared three years ago in Iran and in case of being
ratified, the responsibility of public relations will increase.
Therefore, public relations entities should be prepared for doing their
new responsibilities in global level. (Motamednejad, 2004, pages 83-84)
Although there
are many advantages for the Internet, but the disadvantages shouldn’t be
ignored either. Richard Lining, a member of PR International Association
board of directing, and former chief of Europe PR Confederation,
mentioned some of these disadvantages in his article "the superhighway
of confusing information". The main point he referred to is that anyone
can enter false information to this network. The world of public
relations should be aware of this fact that how simple false information
can be put in this network.
He explained
that since public relations paid attention to the need of clarification
and considering public demand and discussion, the practitioners should
play an important role in preventing the growth of this superhighway of
confusing information. He reminds us that the dangers of Internet
communications are …
1.Credibility
and reliability of information
2.Assuring
the unknown user that a secondary resource exists for that same
information.
Lining
continued that public relations should be competitive and by increasing
their role in the Internet, preserve public’s demands for ever.
By virtue of
the Internet, public relations is not a infrastructure for the world of
information any more and has become a more useful tool.
Due to too
much false information on the Internet, it functions as a flight
platform for public relations to an idealistic and desirable point. It
seems that people, getting familiar with public relations are a proof to
the Internet information. (Richard Lining, the superhighway of confusing
information).
However,
Iran’s public relations faced many challenges and ups and downs and the
new generation of public relations as vanguards of professional
developments and improvement, took many proper actions for expanding
this field. Holding several international conferences, international
communicating, establishing private companies and institutes, publishing
five specialty journal, offering training courses, holding specialty
fairs and workshops, establishing the major of public relations for
bachelor degree and associate of arts throughout the country for
improving the special skills of employees, setting up specialty
publications, establishing Cyber International Public Relations
Association (CIPRA) and active presence in the Internet and the other
actions show that Iran’s public relations are developing and of course
for reaching its professional state, it should expand the campaign in
other fields, especially governmental public relations which doesn’t
have a proper state. Taking actions according to professional, ethical,
occupational standards, international codes, and defense of existence
philosophy of public relations which are people-oriented and
customer-oriented method and defending the rights of citizens and active
presence in international arenas, for expanding peace seeking idea with
any race, belief and thought, are among the responsibilities of public
relations. Therefore, there is no place for opportunists and idles in
the field of public relations, and we should fight with them.
Investing
in public relations
The
International Monetary Fund announced in its annual report that in the
third five yearly plan of Iran (between 2000-2005), the real growth of
Iran’s Gross National Product (GNP) has been 5/5% averagely each year,
the rate of unemployment is decreased, and due to high income of oil
selling, macroeconomics indicators have been improved prominently.
Increase of economic freedom and eliminating big obstacles in the way of
business and investment, along the other economic reforms in 2000-2003,
are among the effective elements in Iran’s proper economic functions in
recent years.
In 2005,
Iran’s economic growth was very high and the reason for this growth were
the positive results of economic reforms, good and profitable conditions
of oil market, and the government’s expanding financial and monetary
policies.
It is
mentioned in this report that privet sector plays an important role in
the high economic growth and producing jobs. Therefore, decreasing legal
and controlling obstacles in the way of private sector’s activities is
necessary. Eliminating the competitive obstacles, facilitating the
regulations of job market, eliminating the decreasing elements of
exploiting and return of investment, and speeding and facilitating
privatization, are the comments of the International Monetary Fund to
Iran in 2006.
Rapid
elimination of foreign currency limits in financial payments and….are
among the other economic needs of Iran and the International Monetary
Fund has appreciated the commitment of Iran’s economics leaders to this
issue.
Iran’s
economics made a considerable improvement in increasing quality and
clarifications in economics and financial information; identifying
subsides in the government’s budget is one of these clarifications.
However, for adequate and timely controlling of governmental sector’s
activities, more actions should be taken. Therefore, developing an
integrated balance sheet for governmental sector with the help of the
International Monetary Fund is a current necessity for Iran’s economics.
(The International Monetary Fund in its annual report about Iran’s
economics, 2005)
Goldman such
economic entity in a report announcing the future eleven economic power
of the world, introduced Iran among these eleven countries.
According to
this report, Iran is among the eleven new economic power of the world
which has the capability to become one of the economic superpower.
Goldman such
Institute announced these eleven countries the future economic
superpower which would become stark competitors of the seven industrial
countries.
In addition to
Iran, Egypt, Bangladesh, Indonesia, South Korea, Mexico, Niger,
Pakistan, Philippine, Turkey, and Vietnam are among the future economic
superpower of the world.
Goldman such
Institute, while comparing these eleven countries with seven industrial
countries and also Brazil, Russia, India, and China, announced that
these twenty two countries would have a hard competition for taking the
world markets in the future.
In addition to
the above mentioned issues, privatization is an important issue in Iran.
The purpose of privatization are decreasing the financial burden of
government, increasing economic competition and efficiency, increasing
the return of investment, optimization of the country’s facilities and
so on. Therefore a combination of government and private sector is a
necessity of any economics system. The more Iran moves toward economic
development, the role of government decrease and the role of private
sector increase. (Moradi, 1984)
Absorbing
investment and investing is a method for speeding Iran’s movement toward
developments and job creation and can be used as a lever for development
and economic growth. In addition to this, foreign investment results in
reforms of managerial system, exchanging of economic experiences and
applying new technologies. For accessing a share of the world great
volume of investment transferring, so many efforts have been made in
Iran and many obstacles have been removed, but Iran’s share of absorbing
the world investment is still very small. (Abbasi, 2004)
On the other
hand, in economic liberalization and globalization process, economic
growth and development will not continue unless the countries succeed in
expanding activities with higher and newer added value, and render
services and products that reserve their states in the world market. In
this case, direct foreign investment as an effective tool in
international production, could play an important role in helping
national institutions. Also, international economic mixing has offered
some opportunities for specializing activities which increase global
dependencies for investment and business developments. (Vakiloroaya &
Danayi, 2004)
There are
different reports and elements relevant to Iran’s economic power. Of
course, referring to geographical positive points of Iran’s business
doesn’t mean that we ignore week points and deficiencies. According to
delivered information, it could be concluded that:
1.Iran with
more than 70 million populations and a wonderful economic power, is an
appropriate place for investment.
2.For
estimating the extent of profitability of investment in
Iran, the effect of public relations should
be studied scientifically.
Statistics
indicate that in recent years the cost of public relations has increased
dramatically in the world. In America investing on public relations has
reached 3.7 million $ in 2005. According to the predictions made by New
York Investment Bank, the costs of public relations increase 9%
annually.
The article
"Public Relations Industry", published on Jan. 19th 2006 in Economic,
evaluates the speed of increasing the cost of public relations before
marketing and publicity. Marketing and publicity costs (475 milliard $
in present) increases 6.7% annually.
According to
the studies made by the Job and Economic Research Center in Britain,
public relations industry in this country has recruited 48,000 people.
More than 80% of them corporation work for companies and other
organizations within corporation.
Researches
made by PRweek/Burson Institute indicates that most managers believe in
the important and vital role of public relations and this statistic show
a considerable growth considering the past years. This report is
approved by Fortune Institute.
To show the
value of public relations it is enough to mention that three
administrations with commercial package possessing the world leading
public relations company are based in UK and USA. They are: (1) Omni Cam
with annual income of $ 9.75 Billion in 2004. it includes Flish Man
Hillard, Kachom, Bortez Noli and Gavin Anderson companies; (2) W P P
with the global income of $ 8 Billions in 2004. it includes Urson
Marlster, Hill and Nilton, Ogli World Wide and J C I Group companies and
(3) Anter Public Group including the world Public Relations Enterprises
of Webrshnok and Golin Heris with annual income of $ 4.92 Millions.
Public relation independence companies of Edlman World Wide, Rodr Fin
Group and Wgrasterdom are the leading companies working in international
level. (P R Week, 2005).
Today, public
relations leading companies linnets in the world are huge companies
among which we can mention Siemens, Microsoft, Hitachi, Egxan, Mobile,
General Motor, Tile Nol, American Express, Fires, Kraisler, Ford,
Toyota, Yahoo, Dopan, Disney, Petrochenia, Boeing, Jaguar, Coca Cola,
Pepsi Cola, Magdonal, Sony and Samsung. (Prof. Hamid Mowlana, 2006)
The result is
that "today, public relations profession tries to show this fact that
investment on public relations has positive output. For example,
business research companies try to show that investment on marketing
communication will lead to the goods sales or at least, in comparison to
the expenditure spent on advertisement, will lead to more sales. Other
practitioners try to show that public relations message has impact on
some cognitive concept such as reputation, brand, image or nature making
the organization values something beyond the tangible properties. (Prof.
James E. Grunig, 2006).
What
is the problem?
The problem
is communication.
As
Bill Nielsen,
the former deputy of Johnson & Johnson Com. corporate communications,
declared in his speech on Nov. 10th 2005, in Yale New York Club,
nowadays, many citizens of developed countries have no knowledge about
the outside world of their countries.
You hear all
kinds of anecdotes about how confused people are about the role of The
Pope and the United Nations. And, who are The Lost Boys of the Sudan,
anyway? The very serious problems in Africa are not things we think
about everyday, when we should (Nielsen, 2005)
United States
made a global opinion poll and requested people to answer to this
question: “could you please give your opinion truly about solving the
problem of inadequate nutrition throughout the world?”
The result was
a big failure:
-
People in
Africa didn’t know the meaning of
"nutrition".
-
People in
East Europe didn’t know the meaning of
"truly".
-
People in
West Europe didn’t know the meaning of
"inadequate".
-
People in
China didn’t know the meaning of "opinion".
-
People in the
Middle East didn’t know the meaning of
"solve".
-
People in
South America didn’t know the meaning of
"please".
-
People in
USA didn’t know the meaning of "the outside
world". (Oren Arva, Management Image News Group/Yahoo, 2005)
A systemic
problem is that there is very little news reporting from around the
world that ever reaches the American public. Only major crisis events
draw our attention, and even then, most of us can?t really visualize
where in the world that event is.
Nilsson in his
speech declared that: “And, the real problem in this is that most of the
world knows how ignorant Americans are about world affairs. How can we
ever expect to restore any level of trust abroad if we don?t make the
effort to understand the issues of those whose favor we seek? This isn't
a new problem, of course, but I think we could agree that there is some
urgency to see ourselves as others see us, and to come to a better
understanding of the world that surrounds us. And, that?s all about
communications, isn?t it? And, shouldn?t this be an issue for PR?s
global agenda for the future? I don?t have all the answers for how to do
this. Certainly we ought to consider using our advertising dollars and
muscle to support more news reporting from abroad, but what about our
employees? Put your imagination to work and think about the impact we
could have with a conscious effort to help build an understanding of the
world we sell our products to among our employees? And by extension,
their families. Fortune 500 companies employ how may Americans?
Millions! Now there is potentially a huge middle ground of
understanding!.” (Nielsen, 2005)
By creating
some balanced models for structures, Young and James E. Grunig show that
organization reputation is the result of the quality of its
communication with its clients. This research show that organization
reputation has its roots in the mentioned quality and general importance
attached to reputation should be attached to relation as well. Public
relations can help the managers by creating communication with the
addresses and the manager can be promoted to the social responsibilities
oriented decisions.
Grunig
believes that relation is the most important intangible property and if
we can show the fact that value oriented public relations can promote
financial value, we can show the investment total output.
David Philips
(2005), the UK prominent figure and practitioner in public relations has
done some studies on the literature concerning intangible property. He
reasons that relations is the most important intangible property. I
think this procedure on investment will show the public relations value
and encourage the public relations scientists to study intangible
properties.
For this
reason, many foreign investors and companies have understood Iran’s role
in profitability very well but till now showed little interest for
investing in public relations, marketing and publicity. Iran’s economic
power and the existing potentials, is exactly the element that
distinguish the geography of Iran’s market. The increase of public
welfare and attempting to improve it as much as possible and creating
proper atmosphere for investment have made this importance even more
distinguished. There are many reasons explaining why investment is so
important in Iran and that how much could it be profitable. These
reasons are as follows:
1.Existing
economic potentials
2.Total
increase in welfare
3.Iran’s
tendency toward absorbing foreign investments and expanding
international communications
4.Financial
security for investment and economic activity in
Iran
5.Ian’s
exceptional and strategic situation due to resource endowment
6.Understanding
the profitability of investment in
Iran and the important face of the geography of market in Iran
7.A
change in the quality of the geography of
Iran’s market and tendency of this market
toward foreign products, because of their higher quality
8.Increase
of Iran’s positive image in the
world and stabling that through scientific, social and economic
interactions
9.Growing
changes in distribution of income and the elevation of people’s
expectation
Therefore it
could be concluded that communicating and understanding this geography
is extremely important and unreal news and analysis, not only give an
unreal guide, but also couldn’t be a place for measuring and doing
marketing and publicity. Iran’s business geography necessitates an exact
assessment of economic, social and even political potentials, parameters
and elements.
Conclusion
The state of
public relations in Iran becomes more and more professional each day and
for this reason, the domestic situation of public relations in Iran’s
business geography differs greatly from those general PR organizations
in the other parts of the world. Planning PR campaigns in this geography
should be according to customers’ expectations and Iranian’s model based
on culture and traditions.
Using
professional images and elements plus qualitative services and products
are extremely valued for Iranians and are important factors of family
life standards. Paying attention to local traditions and social and
cultural goals are very important and effective in public relations
activities and is inseparable principle of international public
relations.
Establishing a
social communications center through public relations activities aiming
at "motivated marketing and motivation orientated" and purity of
activities is extremely important. The experience of many successful
companies of the world such as Panasonic, Sony, LG, Tefal, Bim, Black &
Decker, Delongy, and many others in Iran, could be very useful.
The products
of Tefal have belonged to Iranian family and are cosidered inseparable
utensils for each family. It means that we should first become familiar
with Iran’s business geography by communicating which is done through
public relations. Raising awareness should be done without any mental,
political, or historical tenet and cultural and racial stereotyping.
Then investing for creating a unique public relations model and method
is necessary and unavoidable. Creating effective cultural symbols and
images and then propagating that, is a great solution of public
relations.
It is public
relations that is important in Iran’s market geography and what do
counts today is social awareness to public relations activities. In this
situation, applying public relations in this geography play an important
role because it could be used as a tool for identifying investing
companies and responsible profitability.
Those who are
interested in changes and making profit, need to understand Iran’s
business geography and by having a good knowledge about it invest in
this market. Today Iran’s market is a secure place for investing and
maybe a place for intelligent investors to demonstrate their skills.
References:
A.
Books and Articles
1.PR
Encyclopedia, translated & edited by Mehdi Bagherian, Seyed Aziz Masoumi,
and Hossein Ali Afkhami, Tehran, PR
Kargozar publication.
2.James
E. Grunig (2005), equipping the abstract structure, extensive researches
on PR as a management strategic responsibilities, edited by Mehdi
Bagherian, Tehran, KPRI Press.
3.Hamid
Mowlana (2005), PR Modern principles, technices and skills, second Vol.,
Tehran, KPRI Press.
4.Mohsenian
Rad, Mehdi (2005) Iran in four communications system, Tehran, Soroush
publication.
5.Bagherian,
Mehdi (2004), New principles, techniques and views of public relations,
Tehran: PR Kargozar publication.
6.Afkhami,
Hossein Ali, (2002) PR training,
Tehran: The 8th Art quarterly, No. 27, pp. 59-70.
7.Butane
Carl & Vincent Hazelton (1999) PR theories, translated by Alireza
Dehghan, Tehran: Media Studies &
Research Center.
8.Jalali,
Ali Akbar, (2004) IT and its applications in PR, New principles and
views of PR, Tehran, PR Kargozar publication, page 93.
9.Motamednejad,
Kazem (2004) Public relations in
Iran, New principles and views of PR, Tehran: PR Kargozar publication,
pp. 81-82.
10.
Nateghpour, Mohammad Javad
(2004), PR and development …on the state of social investment, New
principles and views of PR, Tehran: PR Kargozar publication, pp.
109-110.
11.
Afkhami, Hossein Ali (2004), PR
training in Iran, New principles and
views of PR, Tehran: PR Kargozar publication, pp. 137-138.
12.
Mohsenian Rad, Mehdi (2005),
closed systems of public relations in
Iran, Tehran: PR Kargozar quarterly. Page
53.
13.
Aghapour, Mehdi (2004), the
concept of public relations, Tehran:
Hemayat Newspaper, page 12.
14.
Fan Sanders, Trans (2004), the
international dimensions of public relations in Asia, translated by
Zahra Babazadegan, Tehran: abstract
of the first International Conference on PR in Iran.
15.
Nilsson, Bill (2005), the
character of public relations in 2005,
New York: Yale Club.
16.
Mir Saeed Ghazi, Ali (2005),
Theory and function in public relations,
Tehran: Mobtakeran publication.
17.
Moradi, Behnam (1984), the
dimensions of privatization and its effect on private investment (
Iran case study), Economic Political
Information weekly, Tehran: Etelaat Institute publication.
18.
Abbasi, Ebrahim (2004), Absorbing
foreign investors in Iran, Hamshahri
Newspaper, Tehran: Hamshahri Institute publication.
19.
Vakiloroaya, Younes & Danayi,
Abolfazl (2004), problems and obstacles in the way of foreign investment
in Iran and appropriate solutions, Economic Political Information
weekly, Tehran: Etelaat Institute publication.
20.
survey says ceos rely most on PR
professionals for reputation management (Nov. 16, 2004)
B.
Websites:
21.
http://sharitnews.i
22.
http://www.awpagesociety.com/activities/remarks_speeches/nielsen.asp
23.
www.instituteforpr.com/pdf/Nielsen_Lecture.pdf
24.
http://www.chelgate.com/articles/prinasia.htm
C.
Bibliography:
Al-Badr,
Hamoud. (2003). Public Relations in Saudi Arabia. In K. Sriramesh (Ed.),
Public relations in Asia:
An
anthology. Singapore: Thomson Learning.
Black, S.
(1992). Chinese update. Public Relations Quarterly, 37 (3), 41.
Chan, D.
(1994). Kisasuism and the withering away of Singaporean creativity. In
D. da Cunha (Ed.),
Debating Singapore (pp, 71-75). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian
Studies.
Chay-Neneth,
C. (2003). Becoming professionals: A portrait of public relations in
Singapore. In K.
Sriramesh & D. Vercic (Eds. ), The global public relations handbook:
Theory, research, and practice
(pp.86-105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ho, K. L.
(200). The politics of policy-making in Singapore. Singapore: Oxford
University Press.
Hofstede, G.
(2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors,
institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Kipnis, A.
(1997). Producing Guanxi: Sentiment, Self and subculture in a North
China village. Durahm: NC: Duke University Press.
Pegels, C.
(1984). Japan vs. the West: Implications for management. Boston:
Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Sriramesh, K.
(2003). Public relations in Asia: An anthology. Singapore: Thomson
Learning.
Tan, S. P.
(1994). Roles of organized business in public policy making in
Singapore: Changes and continuities. Singapore: Department of Political
Science.
Yuen, C. (1999).
Leninism, Asian culture, and Singapore. Retrieved October 3, 2003 from
http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~yuenck/sing
(PR Encyclopedia, Robert Heath, 2005)
|